Skip to main content

Story of Philosophy (As how I understand it)


Most people hate philosophy. Not because it’s boring—but because of how it was shoved down their throats in school. You sit there, sixteen years old, half-asleep under flickering fluorescent lights, while someone drones on about metaphysics like it’s tax code for the soul. They toss around names like Descartes and Nietzsche like everyone grew up debating epistemology at the dinner table. And when you ask a question? They hand you more terms. More “frameworks.” More essays with footnotes.

No wonder everyone bails on the first week.

But here’s the thing no one tells you: philosophy isn’t dead words in old books. It’s the voice in your head at 2 a.m. asking, “What’s the point of all this?” It’s the moment you stare at your ceiling and realize you’re just a meat skeleton with WiFi, flailing through an uncaring cosmos. It’s real—more real than half the crap we learn for standardized tests.

Philosophy isn’t about finding answers. It’s about learning how to sit with the questions without panicking.

It teaches you how to dismantle reality like a watch, piece by ticking piece, until all that’s left is you—staring into the gears, wondering who wound it up in the first place.

It’s beautiful, terrifying, and weirdly comforting.

Because deep down, we all feel the itch. That creeping suspicion that behind the routines and rent payments and small talk, there’s something more. Something strange. Something unspeakably important. Philosophy hands you the tools to look at that itch dead in the face and say, “Okay. Let’s talk.”

And it’s not just for old men with beards and existential crises. It’s for anyone who’s ever asked why bad things happen to good people. Why we fall in love with the wrong ones. Why we wake up sometimes and just… feel off. It’s not a class—it’s a survival skill.

School just made it sound like homework.

So, where did this whole philosophical mess start? Way before textbooks and classroom eye-rolls—back when people looked up at the sky and thought, “What the hell is all this?” The Pre-Socratics were the OG seekers, the original curious weirdos who tried to make sense of existence without Netflix or caffeine. Thales said everything was water. No, not the ocean or your overpriced bottled water—water as the essence of all things. Maybe he was just thirsty.

His successors, Anaximander and Anaximenes, argued over whether it was some infinite, undefined chaos or just plain air. Think of it as the first episode of “What’s Reality?”—but with more sandals and less production value.

Empedocles came along and said, “Enough with the single-element nonsense.” Four elements, he insisted: earth, air, fire, and water. A bit like mixing paint colors and hoping for magic. He also didn’t buy that stuff could just appear from nowhere or disappear into nothingness. Fair. Because if you accept that, you’re basically endorsing magic tricks. And Empedocles wanted none of that.

Then there’s Pythagoras, who made math spiritual. His triangle theorem wasn’t just geometry—it was a kind of secret code, the universe’s password to order. Maybe he got a little carried away worshipping numbers, but hey, it beats trying to explain existence with just a wet finger in the wind.

Fast forward to Socrates. The man who basically invented the annoying art of asking questions nobody wanted to answer. His big claim? “I know that I know nothing.” Which sounds like a humble brag but really just means he was smarter than everyone else because he admitted how little he actually understood. Not the most popular move in Athens. People saw him as a threat, an intellectual mosquito buzzing in their ears. Spoiler: that got him sentenced to death.

Socrates left behind Plato, who couldn’t stop thinking about perfect versions of everything. Chairs, justice, beauty—all existing somewhere beyond our messy world. To Plato, what we see around us is just a crappy photocopy of those ideals. So much for “reality.” If you’ve ever felt like life’s just a shadow puppet show, thank Plato.

His student Aristotle was more of a practical guy. He wanted to catalog the world like a cosmic librarian, organizing ethics, logic, and science into neat boxes. His work stuck around because, well, someone had to bring a little order before theology took over.

And take it over theology did, with a vengeance. The Dark Ages weren’t just about bad lighting and questionable hygiene—they were about intellectual shutdown. Philosophy bowed to religion, and certainty became synonymous with faith. Ask the wrong question, and you risked your head. Literally.

Then the Enlightenment cracked the door open again. Descartes doubted everything until he landed on one rock-solid truth: “I think, therefore I am.” The universe suddenly felt like a machine, predictable and knowable—until Newton came along with his laws and made it tick like clockwork.

For a while, that was good enough. We told ourselves the universe was a giant billiard table, balls bouncing predictably.

Until quantum physics crashed the party with its uncertainty principle. Suddenly, certainty was a joke. You couldn’t know where a particle was and where it was going at the same time. The universe was less billiard table, more drunk pinball machine.

Nietzsche showed up to laugh at it all. God was dead, and with Him, the idea of absolute truth. Everything was perspective, interpretation—human stories stitched together to make sense of the madness. Truth wasn’t a thing. It was a game, and we were all players.

Derrida took that and pushed it further. Language itself couldn’t capture meaning perfectly—words were slippery, signs pointing to other signs in an endless loop. Trying to pin down truth with language was like chasing a mirage in a desert of words.

And so here we are, millennia later, still wrestling with the same questions. No final answers, just better ways to ask. Maybe that’s the point—not to find certainty, but to live with uncertainty without losing your mind.

Philosophy isn’t a subject; it’s a conversation we’re all invited to join. No matter how messy, confusing, or downright ridiculous it gets.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Blank Verse Poetry

I ran this morning. Gray sky, nothing special. Weather that doesn’t force you to feel anything. Usually, I wander without purpose. Today, something stopped me. Time is a trap. We pretend it’s limited, but it isn’t. So we rush through it—steps, choices, life—until it all blurs. The small things disappear. The smell of earth, the quiet air. Gone. A song got stuck in my head. “I’ll stop the world and melt with you.” Unwanted. Persistent. How did it get in? Maybe fate. Maybe nothing. I don’t believe in destiny, but here I was—stuck in the sound, stuck in a loop. The world paused inside me. I didn’t move. The day went on. Hands trembled—not from connection, but from the weight of existing. Scars on skin—maps of past failures. Nothing clean, nothing clear. I touched a cheek. No softness. Smoke? Habit? Grip loosened—like sanity slipping. Wanting to let go, but afraid of the emptiness that follows. I kissed a cheek. A stupid move. A laugh broke the silence. A glitch. A mistake. Coffee a...

The Slow Death of the Familiar Lie

The 2025 elections just ended. Not with fireworks, not with riots—just the quiet unraveling of yet another chapter in our nation’s long and complicated dance with democracy. There’s something different in the air this time. Something subtle, like the way dusk falls before you even realize the day is gone. You feel it before you name it: a shift. Not seismic, perhaps not even visible to the untrained eye. But there, like a whisper at the edge of a crowded room. People have grown wiser. And no, this isn’t naive optimism. It’s not the kind of blind faith that wears campaign colors and chants slogans. It’s the kind of wisdom that comes from repeated heartbreak—from choosing hope too many times, only to be betrayed by men in suits and smiles. From believing in change only to see it morph into the same old trapo politics dressed in newer fonts. “Pain is a brutal but effective teacher—especially in a country where memory is often the first casualty of every election cycle.” But maybe ...

The Tension Between Hope and Despair

This is w here the light breaks just to drown. Hope isn’t some pretty thing. It’s a slow burn that keeps you awake at night, fooling you with a whisper, “Maybe this time.” It digs its claws in, even when everything screams you’re done. Hope’s the hook you can’t shake, even when it’s tearing you apart from the inside. Despair doesn’t wait politely. It crashes in like a storm, cold and sharp, and it doesn’t care if you’re ready or not. It doesn’t dance with hope—they fight. It’s brutal, ugly. Despair wants to swallow everything whole, leaves no room for mercy. There’s no peace between them. It’s a war you didn’t sign up for, but you live it every damn day—grasping for that fragile flicker, even as the darkness tightens around your throat. You hold hope like a lifeline but feel despair pulling the knot tighter. No balance. No graceful dance. Just a mess of broken promises and shattered dreams. Hope keeps you chasing ghosts; despair waits, patient, knowing it will win. And the worst p...